The Student News Site of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School

Eagle Eye News

Breaking News
  • April 16School Board of Broward County moves to separate with Dr. Peter Licata and hire Deputy Superintendent Dr. Howard Hepburn for three-year contract
  • April 16Broward Superintendent Dr. Peter Licata announces resignation
  • April 6MSD FEA chapter wins 1st place for most creative fundraiser and 3rd place for membership motivation project and scrapbook competition at county convention
  • April 6WMSD TV Program wins five awards at national STN competition
  • April 3Modified schedule tomorrow, April 4 due to PSD and BEST testing for freshmen and sophomores
The Student News Site of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School

Eagle Eye News

The Student News Site of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School

Eagle Eye News

Advertisements
Paragon
Image+still+from+the+remake+of%2C+Pet+Sematary.+%28Paramount%2FTNS%29
TNS
Image still from the remake of, “Pet Sematary.” (Paramount/TNS)

Pet Sematary is not Stephen King’s best work of 2019.

Image still from the remake of, “Pet Sematary.” Photo Courtesy of Paramount/TNS.

Stephen King’s newest reboot for his horror book “Pet Semetary” was released on April 5. The 2019 version of Pet Semetary is the book’s third film adaptation and while it was not bad, pet horror movies should definitely be left in the 1980s because of the odd horror factors.

The story follows a family’s new move into a small town in Maine for an unspecified reason. The movie is set in the present day and the family consists of the father Louis Creed (Jason Clarke), the mother Rachel Creed (Amy Seimetz), an older daughter Ellie Creed (Jeté Laurence), a younger son Gage Creed (Lucas Lavoie) and their family cat, Church. Their cat later passes away and comes back to life after being buried in the pet cemetery, which is the root of problems later in the film.

While moving into their new home, Rachel realizes that the land bought along with their house is where the town buries its pets as a ritual. This area is referred to as “Pet Sematary”, thus explaining the movie title. The horrors of the film bloom from this point onwards.

The flaws with the movie did not have to do with the acting or if it was scary, those points were good, but more with the fact that the present day setting of the movie was too odd for the story itself. For example, the parents in the movie seemed unbothered that there was a pet cemetery on their land and that the children of the town had ritual buryings for their pets, which included the children wearing pet masks.

This problem has occurred before, such as in the movie “Carrie” in 2013. The storyline was good, but it made more sense in the 70s since kids back then were crueler when bullying students, justifying the plot of Carrie when the school bully dumps pigs blood on her.

In “Pet Sematary”, similar problems occurred with parts of the horror aspect of the film. The plot could have made more sense in the past, but for the present day, it can almost be seen as comical to some which could not be relatable to people now.

Although aspects of the movie may not be relatable to 2019, the overall storyline of the movie was solid and entertaining. The movie was surprising, such as using the pet cemetery to revive people instead of animals and the acting was great and will definitely earn the approval of  Stephen King fans.

Leave a Comment
Donate to Eagle Eye News
$655
$1200
Contributed
Our Goal

Your donation will support the student journalists of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. Your contribution will allow us to purchase equipment and cover our annual website hosting costs.

Navigate Left
Navigate Right
Donate to Eagle Eye News
$655
$1200
Contributed
Our Goal

Comments (0)

All Eagle Eye News Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *